Over the years, governments have experimented with various
types of economic systems. Capitalism, communism, socialism, social democracy
and democratic socialism are some of the systems that governments have
experimented with. These systems have worked for some countries and have failed
in some. While communism and capitalism and to some extend different versions
of socialism have been seen to be dominant, some leaders have come up with
their own “synthesis” systems like Col. Qaddafi's green book with which his
country Libya prospered in.
Capitalism & communism have been dominant throughout the
last century and when fused with political ideologies, brought about the famed
iron curtain and the resultant cold. Communism died a gradual death in the last
quarter of the last century as countries first embraced mixed economies and
eventually full capitalism. Privatization of national industries was the order
of the day for many countries. This form of privatization and the liberalization
of the market was championed particularly in the developing countries by the
IMF and the World Bank. It is worth noting that this has worked to a greater
extend in improving efficiency as far as service provision is concerned.
The role of government in business was significantly reduced
to regulatory and infrastructure provision. The government was to put in place
efficient regulatory framework and leave business to the private sector. The
forces of supply and demand were to determine the market prices. While this
worked well in stable and efficient political environment environments, it was
faced with enough challenges in countries where the consumer was not adequately
protected by their respective governments. Rogue politicians have been known to
collude with large companies to come up with laws that do little in protecting
the consumers.
The larger failure of capitalism is normally witnessed in
times of recession like it did in 2008. The global financial crisis has been
mainly attributed to the free market system and capitalism has been blamed
squarely for the financial meltdown. This is because capitalism allows for
growth, with some companies growing to the disadvantage of others, who more
often than not feel disadvantaged. The feeling has always been that “big
business” is favored by governments the world over and as such large
enterprises are resented and the rich are always frowned upon and disliked as
evidenced by the various riots during the G8 and the World Economic Forum
events.
Sovereign wealth funds
Governments are expected to be in business only for the sake
of providing affordable services for their citizens and not for profit. While
this hold true for the largest part of business activities by governments,
there has been a growing profit motive in various government circles across the
world. This has seen the growth of sovereign
funds set up by governments for the purpose of investing in profit making
ventures. It’s through these sovereign funds that we have witnessed the
purchase of entities like Manchester
City by Qatar sheiks and the setting
up of the Oilibya company in Kenya.
The world has also witnessed the development of Dubai World which is basically a government investment. The growth of
sovereign funds is not as widespread in the developing world and is somehow
more grown in only selected countries. However the significance of government
involvement in business for the sake of profit is evident.
State Capitalism – The
new power
The failure of communism brought about the dominance of
capitalism which has been dominant for a while. However the failure of liberal
capitalism has brought about a very potent and powerful alternative which is
state capitalism. This system fuses the powers of the state with the powers of
capitalism, and the government is responsible for picking what it considers to
be winning enterprises in order to maximize returns which will in turn promote
economic growth. This system however uses capitalist ideas like the listing of
the state owned companies on the stock market and embracing a global outlook in
its business strategies.
It is worth noting that the rise of state capitalism has
brought about some of the largest and the most successful companies in the
world. Of the 10 largest listed companies by revenue in 2010, China was
presented by 4 companies. Through state capitalism China has grown to be
world’s second biggest economy. China is the biggest shareholder in over 150
biggest companies within its borders. The state is also responsible for the
monitoring and controlling of thousands of other Chinese companies.
Successful state backed companies run across the board with
Russia’s Gazprom being the world’s largest natural gas company and China mobile
being the largest mobile phone company in the world with over 600 million
customers. One of the most successful chemical companies in the world is Saudi
Arabia’s Saudi Basic industries corporation while Russia’s Sberbank is one of
the Europe’s largest banks. It is also worth noting that Dubai ports is the
largest ports operator while Emirates airlines is experiencing one of the
fastest rates of growth ever experienced in the airline industry since 911.
It cannot be denied that state capitalism is rising at a
faster rate across the nations with 80% of the stock market value in China
being attributed to state owned companies, 38% in Brazil and 62% in Russia.
This is hypothetically the trend of the future as several countries embrace
state capitalism.
The global influence
In China, the headquarters of state owned companies are marvels
of technology. These headquarters have been designed by international
architects and are literal symbols of the state’s emerging power across the
borders and unto the entire world. China Central Television and China National
Offshore Oil Corporation are some of the state owned companies with highly
sophisticated headquarters that are not common with governments. Petronas,
which is owned by the Malaysian government has got an 88 story building in
Kuala Lumpur which serves as its headquarters while Russia’s Sberbank and VTB
have got two skyscrapers side by side as their headquarters. These two banks
are the largest and second largest banks in Russia respectively.
Collectively, state owned companies are tightening their
influence in the global business scene and their influence can be felt across
the continents. These companies are becoming much more wealthier by the day and
are giving the largest private companies a run for their money.
Unlike in communism where the state nationalized private
owned businesses and gained full control, in state capitalism many governments
exert their influence in companies through their ownership of shares as can be
seen in China, Russia, Thailand, Brazil and Saudi Arabia. The state is now
becoming a big shareholder in listed companies while at the same time weeding
out the inefficiencies associated with government run enterprises. However in
some cases, like in Venezuela, the incompetence associated with state run
companies can be witnessed in Petroleos de Venezuela due to political
influence. But most state owned companies have improved and have resisted
political influence and as a result are delivering quality products to their
global markets.
Open Mindedness
Countries that practice state capitalism are more open minded
in their approach to business. They employ talent and have fallen in love with
Western backed consultancy firms lime McKinsey and Accenture. They prefer
Harvard and Wharton graduates to be in charge of their companies unlike in the
past where politicians appointed their cronies to be in charge of state
companies even without the relevant qualifications.
This new approach has seen an improvement to the way in which
products and services are produced and delivered to the global market. These
state owned companies value talent and as such local students who had traveled
overseas come back loaded with MBA's and ready to work for the state because of
the opportunities created by the government. Some of the state owned companies
are said to pay better than the private owned multinationals which is making
them attractive to the newly minted graduates from the top business schools in
the world.
Conclusion
While state capitalism is known widely grown as of now, it
seems to be working in places where it has been implemented effectively. A lot
still needs to be done to ensure that political influence does not ruin the
progress already made, but the reality is that state capitalism can be the
future that the masses are longing for, as long as it works and as long as the
government is effective.
The overall success of state capitalism is yet to be
witnessed to the ends of the earth and as such there are many who are still
skeptical about it. However time has proved that state capitalism can work if
the government is devoid of greedy politicians and the country is devoid of
greedy citizens. The big question then is, is state capitalism the answer to
Kenya’s economic and social quagmire?